YouTube / iTunes / Spotify / Radio Public / Pocket Casts / Google Podcasts / Breaker / Overcast
Listen to ArtisanEnglish.jp posts & lesson intros here.
Word of the Day: Cling to
When you cling to something, you hold onto it tightly or do not let go of it easily.
In our world today, many countries cling to their established relationships, especially when it comes to international relations and geopolitics and evolving spheres of influence.
However, it might be time for nations to reconsider these connections, particularly in light of recent actions by major powers like the United States, China, and Russia.
Countries often cling to their alliances and partnerships out of habit, trust, or historical ties because the devil you know is better than the one you don’t.
For example, Western nations have traditionally clung to the alliances formed during the Cold War.
However, the actions of the United States in 2025 have raised questions about the reliability of such partnerships.
Many countries are starting to feel that it is not beneficial to cling to relationships that no longer serve their interests.
Similarly, China’s growing influence and assertive policies encourage countries in Asia and beyond to rethink their connections.
If nations continue to cling to outdated alliances, they might miss new opportunities for collaboration with emerging powers.
On the other hand, Russia’s actions in Europe have forced countries to reconsider their security strategies and relationships.
Clinging to old bonds may not be wise in a rapidly changing global environment.
Should Canada become a member of the European Union?
Can Japan form defensive ties with Italy and Great Britain?
While it is natural for countries to cling to their traditional partnerships, the recent actions of the United States may be signalling it is time to let go.
By assessing their connections and being open to new alliances, nations can navigate the complexities of today’s geopolitical landscape more effectively.
Embracing the new reality rather than clinging to the past could lead to new partnerships and a more stable future.
Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test
This post compares in readability to The New York Times.
It is likely to be understood by a reader with at least a 10th-grade education (age 16).
On the Flesch-Kincaid reading-ease test, this post scores 48.
The easier a passage is to read, the higher the score on a scale of 0 – 100.
